Interview
Freewriting, Voice, and the Virtue of Making a Mess: A Conversation with Peter Elbow
Peter Elbow is Professor Emeritus of English at the
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and has written extensively on
writing theory and the teaching of writing. He has published several
influential books, including
Writing Without Teachers (1973), Writing
With Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process
(1981),
and Everyone Can Write: Essays Toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and
Teaching Writing (2000), in addition to numerous articles, workshops and
conference presentations. He is an advocate of freewriting and other
strategies that empower students to develop their own voices in writing.
He is currently working on a book on speech and writing.
On 20 October 2008, IW Editors Wade Mahon and Sarah Pogell
spoke with Elbow by telephone.
Articles
-Oral
History’s Turn: Archival Thinking and the Divine Views of the
Interdialectic. Brad Lucas
Abstract:
Responding to the paucity of attention to the interview as a research
method, this article argues for the primacy of oral history interviewing
as a generative practice essential to qualitative research and aimed
specifically to foster knowledge-making. The essay extends oral history
beyond the discipline of history, explicates the complex dynamism and
contextual conditions of an oral history interview, and theorizes the
dialogic and dialectic implications of the interview. Drawing on the
work of Mikhail Bakhtin, Michael Carter, and various works in rhetorical
theory, the “interdialectic” is defined as an intersubjective, highly
rhetorical (epideictic) space that an interview can foment. Finally, the
archiving of oral history collections is emphasized as necessary for
future historiographical work in rhetoric and composition.
-Story, History, and Sociological Theory: a Holistic Method for the
Examination of Long-Term Peace Activism. Leah Rogne
Abstract:
Recent decades have
seen a resurgence in the popularity of qualitative methods in sociology,
and new conversations are taking place about the use of oral histories
and life stories in the construction of sociological knowledge. I
describe a holistic approach to the collection, analysis, and
presentation of oral accounts from World War II conscientious objectors.
I argue for a method that presents the accounts in a way that respects
the integrity of the stories themselves but provides a historical
context and applies theory so that one can contribute to a body of
knowledge in sociology, in this case about long-term persistence in
social movements.
-Interviews and Personal Journeys: Contingencies on Writing. David
Sonenschein
Abstract:
Research interviews are
prescripted insofar as their form and content must be compatible with
the analytic and rhetorical aims of those who will write the results of
the study. Sometimes, however, events will disrupt this feedback and
send
it
in other directions, placing interviews under different criteria for
presentation, and setting them at a disadvantage because the linkage to
a founding discourse has been broken. When the original intellectual
allegiances and production ambitions are abandoned, the interviews risk
being spoken of merely as autobiography, or sent forth in their own
voice.
-HBO’s Unchained Memories: From Oral History to Slavery Memorial. Sarah
Henstra
Abstract:
The film
Unchained Memories: Readings from the
Slave Narratives
(HBO, 2003) explores and celebrates what it calls the “unique historical
record” created by the oral histories of ex-slaves in the southern USA
in the 1930s. This essay treats the film, together with the oral
histories that comprise its source material, as a memory-site: a
discursive space for negotiation between the priorities of public memory
and the private memories of individual subjects. Examining the way a
documentary film “performs” an oral history archive can illuminate the
way oral history itself involves scripting, characterization,
interpretation, staging and rehearsal as well as the recording of the
past. The commemorative achievement of
Unchained Memories
is remarkable despite the film’s avoidance of direct commentary on race.
-Digital Lives: Oral Histories, Community Building, and Experimental
Multimedia. Paul Longley Arthur
Abstract:
The increasing use of
digital media means that oral histories
are now reaching far greater audiences. In fact the oral history field
has come to be a central focus for digital history researchers. This is
because oral histories lend themselves to digital forms of delivery much
more readily than text-based representations of history. This article
reflects on how oral history is being transformed in the digital domain
and presents a research-in-progress report on two major Australian oral
history projects. Both include the production of experimental multimedia
works. The discussion deals with practical issues including
collaboration, funding, design, user interface, navigation, narrative
frameworks, and public access. Multimedia has the capacity to change the
concept of history in the public imagination to something that is
accessible, multiple, variable, infinitely open to renewal, and above
all, something that any individuals in the community can contribute to
through their personal stories.
Reviews
Plagiarism: Alchemy and Remedy in Higher Education,
by Bill Marsh
Reviewed by Elaine E. Whitaker
The Dao of Rhetoric, by Steven C. Combs
Reviewed by Dan Brown
Doing Emotion: Rhetoric, Writing, Teaching, by Laura R. Micciche
Reviewed by Liberty Kohn
The End of Composition Studies,
by
David W. Smit
Reviewed by Lisa
Johnson-Shull
Beyond the Archives: Research as Lived Process, by Gesa E. Kirsch and Liz Rohan
Reviewed by Leslie Jo Sena
|