| [BACK]
Change Colors
490
Home
490
Scores
490
Calendar
490
Questions
Heywood
Courses
Office
Searches
Organizations
Periodicals
News
Web
Sites
Style
Base Maps
UWSP Geo
Dept
UWSP Campus
|
490
Project Report
[BACK]
Every
project has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Within this, your
research will entail a variety of specific tasks leading you to the
completion of the project as a whole. This, and the Design and
Structure pages (use the buttons
at the bottom of this page to get to them), is a rough--and
adaptable--outline of those tasks.
Your
grade in this course does NOT depend on whether you irrefutably
"solve" the problem or definitively "answer" your research question.
Rather, I shall be scoring you on the basis of how well you express
yourself for each required component. A scoring checklist
for your project report appears at the bottom of this page; use it as a
guide to assembling your final product. READ
IT, and include ALL requirements!
Written
Project Report
You
must submit your final project report as a Word document in your team's
network drop box. Do
NOT send it as an e-mail attachment, and do not split the report into
multiple files.
.
-
Title:
Every project must have a title. A good title indicates
briefly
"What, Where, and When"; it may also indicate other attributes of the
project, so long as these do not make the title excessively lengthy (a
three-line title is too long). You must also state the names (and
perhaps affiliations) of all report AUTHORS below the
title.
-
Abstract:
A brief (200 words or less) overview of your problem, methods,
findings, and conclusions. Be direct and to the point; the number
of people who read your abstract typically is an order of magnitude
greater than the number who read your entire report. Abstracts are
the academic equivalent of executive summaries in the business
world. You should write the abstract AFTER you finish your report,
so as to include only the salient details of your work ("descriptive
abstract"). The abstract appears at the beginning of your report,
however.
-
Statement
of the Problem: Usually this occurs in the
Introduction. At most, you should devote no more than a single
paragraph presenting your research question. Sometimes you can do
this in a paragraph having only one sentence. Another option is to
pose the problem as contrasting hypothesis and null hypothesis
statements. However you go about it, you should ensure that the
research question is concise and stands out clearly from other
prose.
-
Literature
Review: This often appears as a subsection of the
Introduction. You should review only works relevant to your
project, not exhaustively list every article even remotely related to
your topic. Offer brief comments about each piece's
significance to your research.
I
recommend that you use the very concise and convenient "Author, date" citation
style. You have no upper limit to the number of citations in
your report, but you must have at least five, of which at least one
should be a book and another a periodical
article.
-
Methodological
Design & Objectives: You must indicate what methods
you used to address your research question, and what purpose you had for
using them. You must also reveal what alternative methods you
considered, and the reasons you opted not to use them. [BACK]
-
Data
Acquisition & Assessment: This may be either a
subsection of you methodological design section, or fall under a full
separate heading of its own. Either way, you must indicate how you
obtained your data, attribute the source if you use secondary data, and
state your judgment and reasoning about the quality of your
data.
-
Data
Analysis and Results: This should be a separate section
with two subheadings. The Data Analysis subsection should detail
what rationale you used for judging the raw results of your analytical
techniques. The Results subsection then provides your raw
findings, and the outcome of any testing that you conducted.
Wherever possible you should use tables to help keep your report as
concise as possible.
-
Interpretation,
Evaluation, & Significance: This separate full
section consists of three subsections. Under the Interpretation
subsection you will have a discussion first of your interpretation
criteria, and then a presentation of your
interpretations.
The
Evaluation
subsection is where you assess the quality and reliability of your data,
findings, and interpretations. This is an extremely important
subsection! You are to describe both the strengths and weaknesses
of your research. Be advised that discovering unavoidable
weaknesses is not a deficiency that will diminish your grade, but
failure to disclose any that you recognize is unethical concealment.
The purpose of noting where weaknesses occurred is to enable
yourself and other researchers to devise improvements during further
investigations. This is extremely valuable insight that you
provide as the experienced researcher!
The
Significance
subsection all too often gets omitted, but you must include it in your
final report. This is where you get to "wave your own flag" a
bit. It is here that you indicate what you have done differently
from previous researchers, and point out what is original within your
work. It is also here where you give reasons for why you believe
your project has been worth conducting, and how you believe its results
are of benefit to the professional community.
-
Placement
within the Topic: This usually brief section is where you
tie your team's work to the body of literature that you described
earlier in the Literature Review. Make special note of any of your
findings that differ from what is usual in others' work, but also note
where your work supports the findings of others. You should also
note where your specific work falls within the more general theories
that pertain to your topic.
-
Summary
& Conclusion: This section is your final "wrap-up",
where as briefly as possible (this section should not exceed three
paragraphs) you reiterate the main generalizations that have emerged
from your project. You do not include any further literature
review or discussions of methodology here; concentrate on YOUR findings
and interpretations.
-
References:
This is a listing of all work by others that you have cited anywhere
within your report, including any figures or data sets. It is NOT
to be an exhaustive listing of all literature that exists about your
topic (that is a bibliography, not a reference list). Include ONLY
works that you have cited.
[BACK]
| PROJECT
REPORT [30% of total grade] |
|
|
| A.
Applied Contribution (Substance I) |
|
|
1.
describe existing conditions
(background) |
x
|
(2)
|
2.
suggest potential
changes |
x
|
(1)
|
3.
expected conditions that might result
(projection) |
x
|
(1)
|
4.
geographical
application/insight |
x
|
(2)
|
| B.
Theoretical Contribution (Substance II)
|
|
|
1.
present synopsis of extant relevant
theory |
x
|
(2)
|
2.
assessment of theory suitability to your
project |
x
|
(2)
|
| C.
Methodological Contribution (Substance III)
|
|
|
1.
data description &
justification |
x
|
(2)
|
2.
subject area and population
description |
x
|
(1)
|
3.
analytical
procedures: |
|
|
a)
appropriateness of
technique |
x
|
(1)
|
b)
consideration of alternative techniques
|
x
|
(1)
|
4.
interpretation of
results: |
|
|
a)
specification of interpretation criteria
|
x
|
(2)
|
b)
interpretation objective and conclusion clarity
|
x
|
(2)
|
| D.
Writing Organization and Style (Technique I)
|
|
|
1.
familiarity with literature/proper
citations |
x
|
(2)
|
2.
technical quality (proofreading, syntax, spelling,
punctuation) |
x
|
(1)
|
3.
clarity of communication (phrasing, terminology,
positioning) |
x
|
(2)
|
4.
objectivity |
x
|
(1)
|
| |
|
|
| E.
Research Design and Significance (Technique II)
|
|
|
1.
originality/innovation |
x
|
(1)
|
2.
stated/demonstrated contribution to extant
research |
x
|
(1)
|
| F.
Researcher Attitude (Technique III) |
|
|
1.
persistence during
investigation |
x
|
(1)
|
2.
flexibility in design and
execution |
x
|
(1)
|
3.
professionalism
(reliability, courtesy, communication,
appearance) |
x
|
(1)
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| RESEARCH
PROJECT SUBTOTAL |
x
|
(30)
|
[BACK]
N. C. Heywood maintains this page,
last updated 14JAN10.
|