|
An overview of good instructional development:
In a nutshell, the backwards process
Essential
Questions
In writing
curriculum or developing instructional tasks the following need to be
considered. If you use the metaphor of those mylar pictures in textbooks
that showed the varied layers of topography, or parts of the human anatomy,
then writing curriculum is a similar process it is like developing a
series of layers until it becomes a whole picture.
McTighe and
Wiggins in Understanding by Design suggest that in crafting
educational experiences one determines:
-
Stage 1.
What is worthy and requiring of understanding?
-
Stage 2.
What is evidence of understanding?
-
Stage 3.
What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest,
and excellence?
I suggest a
little different sequence as their questions should be combined with
your
vision of your exiting learners and reflective end evaluations of all
teaching experiences. In
essence, good curriculum and course development begin with as series of hard
sifting and sorting sessions.
Wilson's
additions - Step 1: Major question
that should direct all of your instruction:
What is your
vision of your learners at the end of their contact with you?
Crafting a vision of your learners at the end of their contact with you.
In creating this vision keep in mind:
1. All
instruction should be measured against:
-
what you know about your learners,
-
how are the
information, processes, and/or skills you are going to teach relevant or important to both the understanding and perpetuation of
your discipline,
-
how the
information is relevant or important to the learners themselves and
their futures.
2. Learn to
keep abreast of generational profiles, social and cultural trends, and
demographics which will enable you to better contextualize information
and learning experiences so that they are meaningful and connected to
learners lives and backgrounds.
3. Become
familiar (please notice I did not say expert) with things like the
latest innovations instructional technology and media, learning styles,
and what neuroscience tells us about how the brain actually learns and
retains information so that you can construct effective instructional
experiences.
4. Too, it is
important to consider what vision you hold of what the learners will
look like after they have contact with you. Create a
well-defined vision of your learners at the end of their contact with
you and then gear instruction toward that vision.
5. Do your
learners have visions of themselves? Older students often have future
visions of themselves. Have you spoken with them about how they see
themselves in the future? What do they want to be or do, and then try
melding your visions and theirs ?
These types of
questions should be asked in forming your end vision of your
learners:
-
Specifically, what skills will they have?
-
What will
they be able to do, and at what level of mastery?
-
What will
they know and understand?
-
How will
they have changed? How will their thinking, feelings, or physical
movement or abilities have changed?
-
What is
your image of the learners? Are they active or passive participants in
the learning process?
-
What
expectations do you have of entering learners? (pre-assess)
-
What
awareness do you have of the culture and history of your learners?
-
How do
students learn best?
-
What instructional techniques and models work well and fit your content
and your types of learners best?
Step 2:
Determine what is worthy of teaching and learning.
Some of the
following have been adapted or modified from McTighe and Wiggins, and these
questions should help in selecting and crafting educational experiences. One
needs to determine:
-
What
information is worth knowing?
-
What
enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and principles) and skills
(procedures) will students need to perform effectively and achieve
desired results?
-
What
activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills?
-
What will
need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in
light of performance goals?
-
What is
worthy and requiring of understanding?
- What
learning and content promotes not only understanding, but interest, and
excellence?
- What is
enduring and/ or at the heart of the discipline/position?
-
What
needs uncoverage?
- What
learning experiences and content are potentially engaging?
- What is
evidence of understanding?
- What
materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals?
- Is the
overall design coherent and effective?
Select
filters that will help you decide what understandings (content, processes,
and skills) and information to select.
They should:
-
Offer
potential for engaging [inspiring or challenging] students
-
Represent a
big idea having enduring value beyond the classroom
-
Reside at
the heart of the discipline (involve doing the subject)
-
Require
uncoverage (abstract or often misunderstood ideas).
[Note: To the
uncoverage concept I would add ideas or concepts that are in flux, in the
process of changing or becoming -- especially if changes are due to new
discoveries, findings, information, research, or areas where ideas are being
fully synthesized into new frameworks or theories. L.Wilson]
Step 3:
What is evidence of understanding how will you evaluate students
progressions toward your vision?
Diagram
from Wiggins and McTighe
Step 4:
Select instructional strategies, experiences and methods of delivery.
Wilson's
addition Step 5:
Reflect, evaluate, refine and revise assumptions, content, and
instructional methods.
Short
form:
1. Create vision of student
2. Identify Ends - Instructional ends should be part of
your vision of the learner, or what you envision for the learner as he/she
leaves your realm of influence. Specifically, what do you want him/her to
know and retain. What should they understand and be able to do? Stated ends
may involve such things as state, national, or professional standards, or
specified district benchmarks or aims. These may provide a framework for
culling content and sifting it into tiered or prioritized layers.
Knowledge, content, skills, or processes that are:
-
enduring
-
worth being
familiar with
-
at the heart of a
discipline
-
important to know
-
engaging and
motivating
-
highly relevant to
students- futures
-
needing uncoverage
"
(list above from McTighe and Wiggins,
Understanding by Design,
ASCD)
Please remember just because materials are in a textbook, they
still may not meet these tests, nor may they be important enough for your
students to know and understand! Use your professional judgment and your
districts curriculum to make these determinations.
B. Expand or recombine - Can specified ends be broken down into
smaller pieces (such as general knowledge, specific skills and performances,
or observed behavioral objectives), or compressed, integrated with other
subject areas, or combined into a comprehensive problem, simulations, or
self-directed investigation?
C. Determine acceptable evidence -
1. What evidence will prove that students have mastered the objectives or
completed the problem?
2. What will they, or should they, be able to do to give evidence of
mastery?
3. Can these skills or this evidence be placed in a graduated rubric that
has clearly stated parameters for each level of gradation (i.e.
unacceptable, acceptable, exemplary, or at introductory, practiced, or
mastered levels?
D. Plan instructional methods and procedures -
1. Plan means of instruction that match all of the above.
2. Choose teaching models that are directly related to what you want to do.
In doing this it is important to consider evidence of best practice,
effectiveness of chosen methodology, recent research on learning and
retention, and an array models of instruction.
3. Re-evaluate developed curricula in light of students progress and
understanding revising portions and tasks where needed. This must be done at
regular intervals to assure that the delivered instruction matches the
intended curriculum.
Based on McTighe and Wiggins,
Understanding by Design,
ASCD and Wilson's prioritizing objectives pages.
Many other sites have portions of
the book or summaries of the ideas.
Chapter 4 - The Six facets of Understanding
for
original materials added copyright
Wilson, L. (2002, 2005)
|