Picture (278x144, 12.6Kb)

 Team Goals 

Picture (349x169, 15Kb)

State Teams: Arizona | California | Illinois | Missouri | Ohio | Oklahoma | Utah | Washington

Community Teams: Chaparral, New Mexico | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | Orange County, California

National Team: Groundwater Foundation

Arizona

I.        Goals our team is working on

A.     Finishing up the YR 1,2, and 3 EETAP goals and objectives (includes database project)

B.     Starting to conceptualize future EETAP goals (YRS 4, 5, and beyond)

C.    In parallel AAEE is working on strategic goals; EETAP goals should support these strategic goals.

D.    Planning for database marketing and future.

E.     AAEE membership recruitment (a goal and a task)

F.     Annual Conference Planning (for Conference September 18 � 21) is a task we are actively working on.

II.      Major questions/issues we are facing

A.     Going into EETAP planning w/o completion of AAEE strategic goals 

B.     What is the focus/intended audience of AAEE (image of AAEE)

C.    What EETAP�s role should be in AAEE in the future?

D.    Do we need to work for EE standards in the AZ State Standards or work to demonstrate how current standards meet EE goals?

E.     Do we need a paid AAEE position?

F.     How do we increase the diversity of our organization?

G.    Long Term funding sustainability?

III.          How we plan to use our time

A.     Networking with other EETAP states � learning from them to avoid �reinventing the wheel�

B.     Planning future EETAP goals

C.    Draft a Scope of the Work for YRS 4 and 5.

Discussion: 

At the Leadership Clinic we want to consider what AAEE has achieved with the EETAP grant, namely building a strong infrastructure.  Based on these accomplishments our main focus will be how we build on this foundation - which direction we take the organization.  Then based on that, what kind of State-wide, and regional coalitions do we need to strengthen or establish?  What specific goals and objectives emerge from that direction?

California

Issue: It is generally agreed by most Californians involved in the field of environmental education that there is an urgent need to analyze and change the nature of existing environmental education leadership structures in California to more effectively engage and serve our diverse constituencies.  

Goal: GSEEC�s (Golden State Environmental Education Consortium) California ETTAP Diversity Leadership Project represents an active effort to develop a diverse, effective and dynamic leadership in the field of the environmental education in California.     

Objectives: Objectives to achieve this goal include:

  • The development of action strategies that will enhance leadership opportunities for individuals from under-served populations.  
  • The development of a list of partnering orgs with similar missions that already serve underserved populations.
  • The development of mutually beneficial relationships with those organizations
  • The organization of a workshop /seminar process that will assist GSEEC members in identifying these strategies
  • The intentional expansion and recruitment of new GSEEC members from under-represented populations
  • The identification of cohorts and allies that can be engaged as partners in addressing the task of developing an effective diversity leadership development work plan
  • The diffusion of the work plan through workshop/s with California environmental education organizations and their collaborators

Major questions:

  • How do we develop new strategies for reaching and maintaining inclusion?
  • What can we do to change EE's language, rhetoric, and activities to be relevant to underserved populations?
  • How do we take it to the next level and create equity in environmental education?
  • What can we do to create new leaders in environmental education?
  • Where are successful educational efforts that promote leadership development?
  • How can the media help us achieve these goals?

How we expect to use our time at the clinic: The California team will focus on developing action steps and processes that will guide GSEEC as it addresses the aforementioned goals.

Illinois

Illinois is looking forward to having an extended amount of time in which to strategize and work together. Capacity building is an exciting venture and with the help of the EETAP grant, we have begun to create a network within the state; however, the demands of �everyday, real� jobs have taken their toll during the past year, in addition to the stress of holding a regional conference and leadership clinic. We have moved forward on our goals: 1) to develop and deliver a Train the Trainer Model Workshop for the Tools Workshop; 2) to build an internet website on EE-Link; and 3) to deliver a coordinated approach to teacher education, but as in every worthwhile endeavor, nothing has proceeded in a linear, straightforward manner. We need to review together and celebrate what we have already accomplished statewide as well as regionally, and then map out and design a process for continuing to move forward.

Our biggest challenge continues to be communication. When EE-Link is up and running, this should help, but communication is much bigger than a website. We need to discuss what �Centers of Regional EE� might look like. The goals of the grant were specific to teacher education and included preparation for non-formals (Tools), building a one stop shopping site for all (EE-Link), and coordinated teacher trainings. Identifying what a coordinated approach to teacher education would look like is the purpose of our evaluation tool, which is currently in design.

We need to empower the coordinators of the various regions to move forward. They, in turn, need to recognize and learn how to use existing support structures, identify and create networks, and maximize the time and opportunities available.

Missouri

Major Issue the MEEA Team is Facing:

MEEA currently has two tangible member benefits:  an EE Certification Program and a searchable database for EE organizations, services, events, and resources in Missouri. The certification program currently has about 90 enrollees and one certified educator.  This program needs an administrator that can maintain participant records and promote the program.  The database is currently in the testing phase; provider recruitment and data entry have begun.  Before the system goes �live�, the data entry process needs to be streamlined, and an administrator needs to be hired for continued promotion and maintenance of the program. 

The main challenge to sustaining these membership benefits is financial support. Since its inception, one of MEEA�s primary supporters was the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC).  Recently, due to deficits in the state economy, MDC has been forced to redirect its funds, forcing MEEA to become self-sufficient by September 2003.  The current board feels that the membership benefits must be maintained in order to sustain MEEA as an organization.  As the MEEA board is made up exclusively of volunteers who serve 2-3 year terms, the board is continually changing; this makes the long-term maintenance of programs difficult and highlights the need for paid staff.

Goals the MEEA Team is Working On and

How the MEEA Team Plans to Utilize Their Time at the Clinic:

The goal of our team will be to create a business plan for MEEA. The MEEA team will begin by assessing the current money matter polices of the Association.  Additional planning time will be spent outlining:  (1) the costs to maintain our current member benefits (2) the responsibilities of the program administrators and (3) a plan to bring additional program subscribers on board.  Ideally the team will draft a couple of options that can then be taken back to the full board for review and selection. 

Ohio

A. Goals

1.      Increase EE among our 5 identified underserved audiences:

      High school, urban/minority, early childhood, social studies, and language arts

  1. Integrate cultural awareness into EE
  2. Include broader audiences in support of EEOhio strategic plan

B. Major questions/issues

1.      Increasing, diversifying, serving and retaining membership and participation

2.      Funding our operations

3.      Incorporating our broader statewide strategic plan (EEOhio) into EECO

without losing breadth and diversity

C. How we plan to utilize our time at the clinic

1.      Learning from others, both other states and resource people

2.      Developing specific ideas to further our goals

3.      Getting to know other team members and identifying ways to follow up from clinic

Oklahoma

Goals:

  • To continue to build capacity for EE in Oklahoma through inclusive and diverse partnerships
  • To design and implement a Leadership Institute whose participants are diverse community leaders who will develop a Master EE Plan for Oklahoma
  • To develop ongoing financial support for annual Leadership Clinics to reach more communities in Oklahoma and annual Leadership Institutes to implement master EE plan

Major Questions and Issues:

  • How to tap into those hard-to-reach groups to include them in the consortium and the master EE plan?  (searching for new strategies)
  • How to develop continued funding for the Consortium Leadership Clinics and Institutes?

(creative funding strategies)

  • What other funders/supporters should we be seeking/developing to sustain Consortium efforts?
  • What are the next steps in building EE capacity in Oklahoma?

Time Utilization during Clinic:

Our team plans to investigate possible answers to the above questions through interaction with other clinic participants, leaders, facilitators, and resource representatives.  We will spend our time actively listening, networking, and honing/practicing skills that will help us to be more effective in our EE efforts in Oklahoma.  We expect to use some of our time in this conducive environment to discuss among ourselves future plans for EE in Oklahoma and purposefully reflect on the possibilities.

Utah

The Utah team is comprised of individuals from the Utah Certification Development Team. The team is utilizing the leadership clinic as a way to help prepare for the launching of the Utah Certification Program. The certification development team has been working on development of an EE certification program for Utah for over the past year and a half. Currently, we are closing in on the launching of the program and will utilize time at the clinic to put the finishing touches on various aspects that still need to be addressed. A few of the items we plan to address at the clinic include: historical EE documents/events/people, marketing/promotion, mentor roles and responsibilities, mentor handbook, USEE PAC governance specifics, program evaluation/assessment.

Washington

Goal:  Create a climate that makes EE a curriculum choice for ed reform.

Strategies: 

  • Promote policies to support EE.
  • Develop academic credibility for EE
  • Create fiscal mechanism for support for EE

Major questions are:

Policy-making

  • Who are the important stakeholders in WA that may be interested in building a coalition in strengthening environmental education role education reform?
  • Where is the best governing body to take our policies forward?  i.e. Are we going through the school boards, the legislature, through OSPI�s existing structure, or attach to NCLB?
  • What exactly are we promoting that would appeal to the stakeholders and the governing bodies to advance ed reform in the states of WA?

Academic credibility

  • Will the Center for Contextual Learning serve as an academic home for EE?
  • How do we establish rigor around research in EE, and what programs do we generate to undertake that research and development work?
  • What professional development programs can we build based upon research in instructional strategies and student achievement?
  • How do we publish, publish, publish?
  • How can we establish a consistent financial flow to an academic center?

Fiscal mechanism

  • How can the new private public partnership fund established under OSPI auspices be funded?
  • How can we access much larger grant amounts?
  • How can the Pacific Education Institute work with stakeholders to bring stability into EE funding?

How do we plan to use the time at the clinic?

Our time at the clinic will be to work cooperatively in small groups and as a large group to answer the above questions with the outcome organized into an action plan.

Chaparral, New Mexico

Chaparral Community Development (CCDA) and Project del Rio have joined forces to strengthen the leadership and communication skills needed to address the communities� most pressing issues.  At the top of the list are environmental concerns related to the lack of a sewage treatment plant and the challenges of influencing change in an unincorporated community that has no elected leadership. 

Currently, CCDA is working with other local community groups to determine the best approaches to strengthening community participation in an area of diverse needs and populations and few resources.  The community believes that community participation is essential to leverage all other community actions.  One avenue for reaching the public is through the local newspaper.  CCDA will be hammering out a communication strategy during the clinic to address political, social and economic issues related to a wastewater treatment plant and how that infrastructure will affect the community. With this information and other outreach efforts, CCDA and other local community groups hope to engage residents in making the best choices for the quality of life and health of the environment in Chaparral.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

The goal of the Oklahoma City Demonstration Community Project is to create an environmental education infrastructure in NE OKC, a predominantly African American community. 

One aspect of our project is to conduct a major community event to share information with residents about specific environmental issues and to invite them to participate in achieving community-wide environmental education and awareness.  This event will showcase activities developed by teachers, parents and students as part of their core curriculums, pursuant to our Project WET training workshop for teachers, held in May of 2003.  We also plan to conduct a �Water Watch� Educational Tour for civic, church, business, neighborhood association and education leaders, and to publish a series of articles that focus on environmental issues in the community.

We will also conduct and complete activities requisite to our Groundwater Guardian Community designation as a method for assisting citizens to corroborate facts with perceptions about environmental issues in the community.

Several of the major issues facing our team are:

  • Members� time constraints
  • Lack of funding
  • Partnership recruitment/development/buy-in
  • Packaging and Marketing the message/Media Coordination
  • Volunteer base development

Our team will use the time at the clinic to continue fine tuning the plan and processing planning activities.  We will continue identifying, reviewing and establishing contacts with national, state and local resources that will aid us in achieving our goals.  We will also discuss plans for developing fundraising capacity to sustain the project beyond the present grant period.            

Orange County, California

The goals our Team is working on: The Orange County Team recently completed the selection of our project; so at this point we have established the following goals and objectives:

Project Goal: To develop a model Stormwater Management Program to assist a school in complying with the new Municipal Stormwater Permit Requirements with an emphasis in environmental education.  We plan to achieve this goal through the implementation of these objectives:

  • SELECTION of a school/district to partner with to develop a stormwater management program to comply with the MS4 requirements
  • COMPLETION of a Stormwater Management Plan that addresses each of these areas:
  • Public Education
  • Public Involvement/Participation
  • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
  • Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control
  • Post-Construction Storm Water Management in New
    Development and Redevelopment, and
  • Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations.
  • DEVELOPMENT of a �campus� stormwater education program that meets state content standards and provides academic gain for students.

Major questions/issues you are facing:

At this point in the project the major issue we face is developing a process or approach to select the school to be involved in the partnership. The resources and expertise to complete the remaining two goals for the project exist within the Team. What is needed is the resources and time to facilitate the selection of the school.

How we plan to utilize the time at the clinic:

Our Team plans to utilize the time at the clinic to: learn techniques to better facilitate communication and consensus among our Team; identify strategies to evaluate the effectiveness of this project and future projects; learn methods to build synergy between the two groups to sustain this collaborative effort; develop a project schedule; and define the necessary tasks and sub-tasks, time necessary to complete each task, timelines and milestones necessary to complete the project.

Groundwater Foundation

Goals: increase awareness of and participation in The Groundwater Foundation�s Groundwater Guardian (GG) program. 

Increasing Awareness: Will be done by revising all GG program materials, including GG pages on the Foundation�s web site, the Guide to GG, and the GG brochure.

Increasing Participation:

In 2002 150 GG Communities and 34 Affiliates were designated in 34 states and one Canadian province.  Since GG began in 1994, over 300 communities have participated in the program.

Of the 53,437 community water systems in the U.S., 41,691 are groundwater systems.  These systems serve 84,025,121 people.  This is an incredibly large pool of potential GGs.

Increasing participation in the GG program has always been a challenge because it depends exclusively upon local leadership.  Foundation staff can coach and counsel GG teams as they build local teams and adopt and implement activities, but in the end it is up to local leadership whether their community will earn designation as a GG.

A project focusing on the recruitment of small communities into GG is coming to a close.  A final report detailing lessons learned from the project will be prepared to advise Foundation staff and others about what makes community-based programs like GG successful.

Major Questions/Issues

Increasing Awareness:

  • How do most people learn about GG? e.g. internet search, through a professional organization, newsletter, word of mouth, etc.
  • Who needs to be aware of the GG program? e.g. potential team members (educators, ag/business, local government, citizens), local leadership � aka �sparkplugs�, water system operators, etc.

Increasing Participation:

  • What motivates and contributes to a community participating in the GG program?
  • How can Foundation staff increase participation in the GG program?
  • Plan to Utilize Time at the Clinic
  • Increasing Awareness � revise GG promotional materials
  • Increasing Participation � prepare first draft of the Field Staff project final report

 

Return to Leadership Clinic 2003 Homepage