Center for Land Use Education Logo
Center for Land Use Education

The Land Use Tracker
Volume 2, Issue 4
Spring 2003

IN THIS ISSUE:

bullet 2003 Comprehensive Planning Grant Awards Program
bullet

Smart Growth: A Solution to Sprawl?

bullet Guides to the Planning Elements
bullet

CLUE Launches New Comprehensive Planning Education Project

bullet A recent court opinion about expansion of nonconforming uses�
bullet Calendar of Events
bullet

Article Submissions

bullet

Our Staff

bullet what's new at the center
bullet

Contact Us by E-mail

Center for Land Use Education Logo
CLUE Homepage

 

PREVIOUS ARTICLE | FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE

 

Smart Growth: A Solution to Sprawl?

By Anna L. Haines, Ph.D.

The previous article entitled �Defining and Characterizing Sprawl� focused on defining sprawl and identifying its urban and rural characteristics. In turn, this article tackles how to address sprawl by examining smart growth. Like the previous article, this one will focus on small town and rural areas.

Reedsburg, Wisconsin
Reedsburg, Wisconsin

There are two basic models presented in the literature as possible solutions to sprawl � smart growth and new urbanism. Generally, both models aim at tackling sprawl in metropolitan areas, such as the Milwaukee/Waukesha/Kenosha area, the Fox Valley, and Dane County. Because smart growth policies can be altered to fit a small town or rural area more readily than new urbanism (see Box 1), this article will attempt to define smart growth and discuss how several smart growth policies can be adopted for use in small town or rural settings.

Box 1: New Urbanism

New Urbanism generally focuses on the neighborhood or town scale, on new areas of development, and almost exclusively on physical design. Seaside and Celebration, Florida are examples of New Urbanist developments. These developments aim to produce compact, livable communities. An idea that stems from new urbanism is called �traditional neighborhood development� or TND.

Generally, TND�s occur on greenfield sites, i.e., undeveloped land, including agricultural fields. Ideally, they could be built on brownfield sites (previously developed, vacant and/or polluted sites) within cities. Rather than allowing a 200 acre subdivision with 100 houses evenly spread over that land with garages and roads dominating the feel of the development, a TND would bring the houses closer together, add a small retail district with the possibility of apartments above stores, de-emphasize cars and roads by creating alleys and placing garages in the rear of the lot, and focus attention on people through sidewalks, front porches and small lot sizes. This development option is important because it potentially provides consumers with additional choices about the kind of suburban development they will choose to live in.

Wisconsin�s comprehensive planning law (WI statute 66.1027) provides that cities and villages over 12,500 people must pass a TND ordinance. However, TND�s do not present a viable option for many smaller communities that experience development at a much slower pace. Small cities and villages that would like to encourage this type of development over time could therefore use the land use element of their comprehensive plan and incorporate many of these principles into their zoning ordinance. Since TND�s are focused on replicating a bygone era, it is necessary to understand a community�s past development patterns and include those design standards into a community�s zoning and subdivision regulations.  

So What Is Smart Growth?
Smart Growth is a new term for an old idea � growth management, which is a strategy that communities have used for approximately forty years. Growth management evolved over time, and one could argue that smart growth is its latest evolution. Growth management has largely been used in states and metropolitan areas that have experienced rapid growth rates � Florida, Oregon, and New Jersey to name a few. Some of the primary tools used in growth management include: zoning, development buffers, purchase of development rights programs, urban growth boundaries, minimum density requirements, cluster development, and exclusive agricultural zoning. Over time as the number of places that experienced more rapid growth than they were used to and that growth tended to spread outward more quickly than previously, growth management was repackaged and expanded into the �smart growth� movement.

Smart growth, like sprawl, has many definitions depending on one�s perspective. Below are five definitions or ways in which different groups have conceptualized smart growth:

  • Smart growth is �understanding that suburban job growth and the strong desire to live in single-family homes will continue to encourage growth in suburbia.� National Association of Home Builders

  • �Smart growth promotes economic prosperity and enhances the quality of life through measures that respect the importance of freedom of choice, flexible land uses, and natural resource management.� National Association of Industrial and Office Properties

  • �Smart growth does not seek to stop or limit growth, but rather to accommodate it in a way that enhances the economy, protects the environment and preserves or improves a community�s quality of life.� Urban Land Institute

  • Smart growth solutions are �those that reinvigorate our cities, bring new development that is compact, walkable, and transit-oriented, and preserve the best of our landscape for future generations.� Natural Resources Defense Council

  • Smart growth is �calling for an end to sprawl and a new vision of urban/suburban collaboration and regional growth management.� Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse

(Gillham, 2002: 157).

Like definitions of sprawl, there are no agreed upon definitions of smart growth. Neither what it is nor how it works is clearly defined. Most definitions depend largely on whether an organization favors development or conservation. Embedded in many definitions are the following ideas:

  • Acknowledgement of continued construction of single-family homes,

  • Importance of balancing development with natural resources,

  • Importance of managing growth rather than stopping it,

  • Recognition that cities are important to our quality of life,

  • Recognition that new development patterns that favor compact and walkable/bikeable communities are possible and allow for a wider range of transportation choices, and

  • Recognition that intergovernmental cooperation is a key factor in addressing growth.

Kentlands, Maryland, NRDC
Kentlands, Maryland, NRDC

Are Smart Growth Policies Solutions to Sprawl?
Box 2 outlines ten smart growth goals, recognized by many groups, including government, business and civic groups. A key idea behind these goals is the need to balance development with the protection of natural resources, such as farmland, forests and wetlands. From identifying goals and objectives, a community needs to identify policies and implementation tools so that those goals and objectives can be achieved. Below are three guidelines for thinking about how to get from goals and objectives to policies and tools:

  • No one policy will achieve an identified goal; use a number of policies in combination, including but not limited to, community planning, education, use of technology, incentives, and regulations.

  • A key step in the planning process is evaluating and understanding how your community has grown and changed in the past, and making a group decision (through visioning, for example) on whether or not your community wants to modify the way that growth and change have occurred.

  • If a community vision lends endorsement to establishing a new �smart� way for growth and change to occur, then explore innovative policies to accomplish that vision.

(Smart Growth Network)

Table 1 outlines a few policies for each goal outlined in Box 2. The tools can be implemented at the local government level and are appropriate for small towns and rural areas.

Boulder, Colorado, NRDC
Boulder, Colorado, NRDC

Conclusion
Sprawl and smart growth represent two opposing and contrasting patterns of development along a continuum. Communities have not consciously chosen the path to sprawl, but communities now have the opportunity to consciously choose an alternative path. Wisconsin communities are in a unique position, because of the comprehensive planning law, to examine community growth trends, understand the implications of those trends, decide the future path their community will take (visions, goals and objectives) and how they will move along that path (policies and tools). The planning process that many communities are going through, and will go through, afford the public a chance to decide the future of their communities. Altering a community�s growth pattern away from sprawl towards one that preserves, maintains, and creates a sense of place and better balances development with natural resources and open space will not be an easy or simple task. However, in making plans and abiding by them, communities can begin to create healthy and vibrant places to live and work.

New Richmond, Metropolitan Council
New Richmond, Metropolitan Council

Dana Lucero, Kassandra Walbrun, WDNR Land Use Team, and the Center for Land Use Education staff have reviewed this article for form and content. Any errors, mistakes and omissions remain the responsibility of the author.

 

References
Gillham, Oliver. 2002. The Limitless City: A Primer on the Urban Sprawl
     Debate. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Nelson, Arthur C. 2000. The Practice of Local Government Planning.
     Washington, D.C.: ICMA.
Smart Growth Network. Undated. Getting to Smart Growth: 100 Policies
     for Implementation. Washington, D.C.: ICMA. www.smartgrowth.org 

Resources
The American Planning Association. www.planning.org 
Congress for New Urbanism. www.cnu.org/ 
EPA smart growth website. www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/ 
The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. www.lincolninst.edu 
Smart Growth Network. www.smartgrowth.org 
Traditional Neighborhood Development.  A Model Ordinance.
     www.wisc.edu/urpl/people/ohm/projects/tndord.pdf 
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
     www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/es/science/landuse 

Middleton Hills, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin
Middleton Hills, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin

 

A Review of Wisconsin�s Comprehensive Planning Law
Often, Wisconsin�s comprehensive planning law (WI Statute 66.1001) is referred to as the �Smart Growth� law. However, labeling the entire law �smart growth� is a misrepresentation. The law changed the definition of comprehensive planning, so that now plans must:

  • Include nine elements (issues and opportunities; housing; economic development; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, cultural and natural resources; land use; intergovernmental cooperation; and implementation)

  • Include public participation,

  • Be adopted in whole by ordinance by the elected body, and

  • Future land use decisions should be consistent with the plan.

The plan only needs to be prepared and adopted if that local government, be it town, village, city, county, or regional planning commission, is going to make land use related decisions after January 1, 2010.

The �smart growth� part of the law is attached to the funding mechanism. If a local government would like to receive state assistance for preparing its plan, planning grants (both general and transportation-specific) are available. A local government that discusses within their grant application how it will plan for fourteen goals specified in the law (Box 2a), and how it will plan for �smart growth areas� (Box 2b) will likely receive a higher score in the grant application process. An incentive for local governments to plan with their neighbors (to promote intergovernmental cooperation) is also included within the grant scoring criteria.

14 Local Comprehensive Goals: Planning grant awardees must specify how they will achieve these goals and state agencies are encouraged to integrate these goals into their work plans.

  1. Promotion of the redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and public services and the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing residential, commercial and industrial structures.

  2. Encouragement of neighborhood designs that support a range of transportation choices.

  3. Protection of natural areas, including wetlands, wildlife habitats, lakes, woodlands, open spaces and groundwater resources.

  4. Protection of economically productive areas, including farmland and forests.

  5. Encouragement of land uses, densities and regulations that promote efficient development patterns and relatively low municipal, state governmental and utility costs.

  6. Preservation of cultural, historic and archaeological sites.

  7. Encouragement of coordination and cooperation among nearby units of government.

  8. Building of community identity by revitalizing main streets and enforcing design standards.

  9. Providing an adequate supply of affordable housing for individuals of all income levels throughout each community.

  10. Providing adequate infrastructure and public services and an adequate supply of developable land to meet existing and future market demand for residential, commercial and industrial uses.

  11. promoting the expansion or stabilization of the current economic base and the creation of a range of employment opportunities at the state, regional and local levels.

  12. Balancing individual property rights with community interests and goals.

  13. Planning and development of land uses that create or preserve varies and unique urban and rural communities.

  14. Providing an integrated, efficient and economical transportation system that affords mobility, convenience and safety and that meets the needs of all citizens, including transit-dependent and disabled citizens.

Smart Growth Area Definition
"�Smart growth area� means an area that will enable the development and redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and municipal, state and utility services, where practicable, or that will encourage efficient development patterns that are both contiguous to existing development and at densities which have relatively low municipal, state governmental and utility costs.� (WI Statute: 16.965)

PREVIOUS ARTICLE | FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE