Center for Land Use Education Logo
Center for Land Use Education

The Land Use Tracker
Volume 3, Issue 4
Spring 2004

IN THIS ISSUE:

bullet CONNECTING LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION IN YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
bullet

CONDITIONAL USES:  WHAT ARE THEY, WHO DECIDES THEM AND WHAT CONDITIONS MAY BE INCLUDED?

bullet

e-mail important considerations for local officials

bullet

Calendar of Events

bullet

Article Submissions

bullet

Our Staff

bullet what's new at the center
bullet

Contact Us by E-mail

Center for Land Use Education Logo
CLUE Homepage

 

FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE

 

Connecting Land Use and Transportation in Your Comprehensive Plan

By Barbara Feeney, AICP and Kassandra Walbrun, AICP
Wisconsin Department of Transportation

 

Land use and transportation are significantly connected to each other and have an effect on virtually everyone in a community. While land use decisions are generally considered local and regional issues, the transportation impacts that accompany land use decisions can transcend the boundaries of communities and regions.

Many communities often decide how to handle automobile and truck traffic, transit connections, bicycle and pedestrian movements, and access on a reactionary basis to a specific development proposal. Often there is not enough time or information to address the long-term needs in the community with one development decision. Over time, decision after decision made outside the context of a long term plan can have detrimental effects to a community�s transportation system.

A decision to allow a new commercial shopping center, for example, will impact the traffic along adjacent roads. To what extent will depend on the volume of traffic the development will generate and the existing roadway conditions. If congestion or safety problems already exist on the road, that new development may compound the problem.

Decision makers need to have an appropriate amount of information and a long-term vision for the community�s transportation system when approving development proposals. Developers need to provide adequate information on their proposal to assist the decision-making process. So how should a community accommodate economic development while not causing unbearable congestion or safety troubles?

Comprehensive Planning is the Key to Success

While not a magic tonic that alleviates all controversy in land use decision-making, the comprehensive planning process is the best way to address the connections between economic development, land use and transportation by developing a long-term view for the community�s future. Meaningful public involvement that engages all citizens and community interests is imperative.

Transportation issues reach everyone and are often the most controversial parts of land use decision-making. If policies and standards are in places that apply to all development proposals, it is easier for local officials to make sound decisions, and ensures a fair process for all.

To prepare communities and local officials to make well-informed decisions, the best plans do the following:

v Have a clear connection between the issues and opportunities element, and the data collected.
Many plans contain a plethora of data, but are limited in the analysis and future direction provided to the community in the plan elements. It is relatively easy to collect data � and comprehensive plans can become a basket into which all available data is tossed, regardless of its value to the planning process. Avoid this tendency by completing the Issues and Opportunities identification first, and then decide what kinds of data are needed to support further planning efforts.

v Reflect communication with stakeholders.
Build time into the planning process to meet with stakeholders whose actions can affect the community, or whose support is needed to accomplish community goals. The list includes state agencies (Departments of Natural Resources and Transportation most particularly), developers, economic development agencies, groups representing aging and disabled persons, businesses and the local school system.

v Include analysis of the adequacy of existing zoning and subdivision regulations.
Many communities have regulations that have become outdated, or are not consistent with the goals the community identifies in the planning process. For example, the goal of encouraging more pedestrian and bicycle trips can only be achieved if subdivision regulations limit block lengths and require sidewalks. The Model Ordinance for Traditional Neighborhood Development available on the Wisconsin Department of Administration�s website can provide guidance on these issues.

v Uncover important opportunities that already exist.
Local communities are sometimes unaware of opportunities that already exist that could be take advantage of to achieve community goals. Examples of this include a community�s waterfront that is underutilized or its proximity to a rail line. The comprehensive planning process can seek input from stakeholders who may see overlooked opportunities.

v Reflect a realistic understanding about major state or local investments.
Being visionary is one thing, and being blind to reality is its opposite. Communities should not stake their plans upon a major investment in a state transportation facility, for example, if no such project is on the horizon. Some comprehensive plans have assumed major state investments will be made and base the land use element upon these assumptions even when a transportation project is not planned for in the future by Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT). Likewise, plans predicated upon local initiatives that are hopelessly unrealistic are doomed to failure. That being said, the combination of a motivating vision and effective leadership can move communities to accomplish great things. The key is finding the balance between vision and reality.

v Prioritize actions, activities and implementation efforts.
A plan that tries to accomplish everything may sink under its own weight. The planning process should build in checkpoints along the way to select the highest priorities for further investment of planning resources.

Picture (1630x2227, 432.7Kb)Working Within the Planning Process

WisDOT�s Wisconsin Department of Transportation Logo Transportation Planning Resource Guide, which can be found at   www.dot.state.wi.us/localgov/land/resourceguide.htm , gives detailed recommendations for developing the transportation element of the plan. Below is a general list of things that, at a minimum, the plan should accomplish related to transportation and land use in order to be complete and useful:

1.  Plan for a local transportation system to meet local travel needs.
Communities often try to minimize road maintenance costs by skimping on the extent of the local road system. This may result in local traffic using the state highway system. WisDOT views state highways as a scarce commodity whose primary function is to carry traffic between regions of the state. The functionality of the state highway system is degraded when communities depend upon it to be the only arterial in town. In the long term this will not serve the needs of the community because as congestion increases, the area becomes less attractive for investors and for shoppers.

2.  Identify existing safety problems.
The local planning process should identify safety problems associated with the existing road system and seek ways to resolve those problems.

3.  Address access management issues.
Access management is one of the most cost-effective measures a community can take to maximize the usefulness of its roadway investments. WisDOT District staff can provide educational materials that will help your community understand the value of managing access properly.

4.  Plan the local transportation system to meet the needs of various planned land uses. Seek balance.
Communities often want to concentrate certain land uses, especially commercial development, along the main arterials. Lining up all the development along a few arterials doesn�t just affect the local traffic patterns - it also can affect regional traffic. From an aesthetic perspective, stripping out a highway with development does little to enhance a community�s visual character and sense of identity. For safety, mobility and visual appeal, communities should consider a planned approach that builds development in blocks or groups, instead of strips, with multiple pathways and connections for all modes to move into and out of the development. Planning to accommodate residential development in the vicinity of commercial and business uses (with appropriate buffers) also provides a customer and employee base nearby, encouraging walking or bicycle trips.

5.  Propose standards for meeting bike and pedestrian needs and consider transit options.
There is increasing anecdotal evidence that successful communities address the needs of non-motorists. Many surveys show that transportation is considered part of the set of quality of life issues. Children, the disabled, and many elderly people rely on modes other than the automobile for mobility. Additionally, many people would prefer to use other modes for some of their trips if routes are safe and efficient. Meeting these needs and desires requires that communities plan for and make investments in these modes.

6.  Identify missing connections for all modes.
Most communities have broken links in their transportation systems. Sometimes relatively small investments can make big improvements in the overall system. Congested roads may point to broken links in the road network. Users are the best source of information about missing links in the pedestrian and bike networks.

7.  Propose connectivity standards.
The best way to avoid the retrofit activities discussed above is to require new development to connect to the existing transportation system and include a logical street grid. Even if curvilinear streets are preferred over a more traditional rectangular grid system, internal neighborhood connectivity is achievable and should be required. Including these standards in the subdivision ordinance gives upfront direction to developers.

Item Lead Agency

Item

Priority

(H/M/L)

Links or Partners
Revise subdivision ordinance Zoning/Planning

Dec 2004

H

UW Extension, WisDOT
Form economic development commission Chamber of Commerce

June 2005

H

UW Extension, Tech college
ID well recharge points Utilities/Public Works

June 2004

M

DNR
Develop capital improvements plan Administrator�s office

Sept 2005

M

All local agencies

Example of implementation chart.

The Money Problem

Most communities cannot afford to address all potential community issues in depth in the comprehensive plan and, indeed comprehensive plans generally are not intended to do this. However, the �plan collecting dust on the shelf� syndrome is often the result. The solution is to include an implementation section that is specific about tasks to accomplish and identifies lead agencies or departments to take responsibility for implementation.

On the next page is an example of how a chart in the Implementation element might look for a small, incorporated community�s plan.

WisDOT Staff Expert Assistance is Available

WisDOT staff in eight district offices across the state are ready to help your community in the development of your comprehensive plan. For WisDOT staff contact information for your community, go to Wisconsin Department of Transportation Logo www.dot.state.wi.us/localgov/land/contacts.htm or call 608-261-8618 for more information.

Your community can request that WisDOT staff be involved in your planning process in a number of ways. Some of these include participating on a technical committee, meeting with your community and/or consultant to discuss transportation issues and reviewing your community�s draft transportation element. This coordination helps you to ensure your community�s plan is coordinated with WisDOT and various state and regional transportation plans. WisDOT staff can help in many ways including:

Data and Information. WisDOT has a number of transportation data and information resources useful for your community�s inventory and analysis process, such as traffic data, functional classifications and maps. This can reduce the time and cost of your data gathering. WisDOT District staff can help to identify state and regional transportation plans and assist in determining how to �incorporate� these plans into your community�s comprehensive plan.

State and Local Transportation Issues. WisDOT District staff can identify planned state transportation projects that may affect your community and comprehensive planning process. These projects often involve improvements to state highways in your community, however project information regarding other transportation modes will also be available. Your community will be able to share its vision and local transportation plans with WisDOT as well as WisDOT sharing the state�s transportation issues that directly affect your community. Coordination helps improve your comprehensive plan and foster long-term cooperation between your community and WisDOT.

State Planning Grants. Discussing your community�s transportation issues and coordinating with WisDOT District staff will help your community to better address grant application questions relating to transportation. If you have received a state grant, staff can assist you in the requirements of the grant including coordinating with a Metropolitan Planning Organization, where applicable.

For more information visit WisDOT�s website on Transportation and Land Use found at: Wisconsin Department of Transportation Logo  www.dot.state.wi.us/localgov/land/index.htm.

For WisDOT staff contacts, go to Wisconsin Department of Transportation Logo  www.dot.state.wi.us/localgov/land/contacts.htm or call 608-261-8618.

Wisconsin Department of Transportation Logo

 

FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE